Back to articles

EEOC’s new guidance regarding sexual orientation and gender identity workplace discrimination

by Patricia Goodson

In Bostock v Clayton County, the US Supreme Court held that terminating an employee on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity violated the sex discrimination prohibition found in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and federal courts have interpreted Bostock to mean that other acts prohibited by Title VII are unlawful when done on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Employers subject to Title VII should review the EEOC’s resources and take steps to comply, including:

  • Updating discrimination and harassment policies to include sexual orientation and gender identity.
  • Revising grooming and dress codes.
  • Developing a plan for what to do if an employee “comes out” or plans to “transition”, including how to update the employee’s public-facing image and what accommodations may be needed. (Some documents may use an employee’s chosen name, but other documents require recording an employee’s legal name and gender, and may not be changed absent a court order or other government record.)
  • Updating documents to include diverse sexual orientations and gender identities.
  • Training workers on the implications of Bostock.
  • Reminding employees of the reporting procedure for discrimination or harassment of any kind.


Photo: Sharkshock - stock.adobe.com

25 April 2022

Patricia W. Goodson

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP, Partner

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP